Jump to content

Talk:Sophie Howard/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Date of birth

Check out what this picture has to say about her age (#5). Also see what has been said here, here and here (some of these links contain partial nudity). Who to believe?

And they've got that gold-thing all wrong in the first link: they used weight to calculate the price in gold, when they shoud have used volume (c. 790 cm3 each), since gold is c. 21.5 times denser than fat (that's what they're made of). With today's price of gold that would add up to c. £333,000 ($582,000/480,000 €) for the pair.

I know that having a lot of external links in a Wikipedia article is frowned upon so I've moved these links here for discussion:

Cheers, JohnJTSmith 00:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I've just gone and added this Sophie's nerd log site I remembered seeing once. I don't know which is actually her official site, however this one has a blog and regularly updated pics that lead me to suspect that this might have more validity. Driller thriller 00:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Lupus Citation:

Breast Size

In issue 172 of British Nuts magazine Sophie Howards breast are issued as a 34G, i have replaced the previous size of 32F so that we all are assured of the actual size of her beautifully formed natural assets! Dirk Valentine (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Penis

Surely this comment is vandalism. Anyone who believes that a girl can be born with a penis that then drops off at puberty is in need of help.

Potentially defamatory material

Do others agree that the following entries are poorly sourced and potentially defamatory?:

[[1]] [[2]]

I have found nothing to support these assertations on the internet, and the magazine websites do not confirm this information either. I believe I have been right in deleting this information before, since this is a Biography of a Living Person.

Could someone provide an opinion (other than 92.7.14.122 and Megastrike14)? 141.163.196.7 (talk) 00:46, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

She would of needed to complete her degree to be a teacher so thats obviously bogus, the other part probably is since its got no ghits though being a lesbian in and of itself isn't defamatory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.38.135 (talk) 16:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Picture as of 16:51 27th Oct

I don't think this a particularly good picture. It is ambiguous as to which one is Howard, the nipple may offend some and might be against policy, and I think the copyright is a little dubious. I'll remove it if there is no objection.Rtdixon86 (talk) 16:52, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Archive 1