Talk:Souad Faress/Archive 1

Archive 1

Notability

It has really never been clear to me HOW to indicate 'the importance or significance of the subject' - any pointers??

This is an actress whose voice is immediately familiar to many millions of UK and other radio listeners - how to indicate that? --Ndaisley (talk) 20:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2016

Please would you consider deleting the date of birth. Souad Faress is the subject of a hate campaign at this time and less personal information would be helpful. We see also that the page is semi-protected and would suggest it be protected or semi-protected for a longer period. Being largely unfamiliar with the editing procedure, we apologise for any infringement that may be inadvertently set down by this request. You may already have noticed trolling of this person as it appears to be extensive.

TheNiki500 (talk) 19:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done:I see no reason why the DOB should be changed. Stephenjh (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done: The DOB is sourced. I am not sure how that information would be used against her. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:45, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Victim? Hate campaign? Wow. No words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.132.10.250 (talk) 10:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Indeed she's being the subject of a hate campaign. Articles related to her and her character in the Game of Thrones wiki have being targeted by these slanderers and haters.--Gonzalo84 (talk) 13:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Souad Faress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://bbc.co.uk/radio4/archers/backstage/souad_faress.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Censorship of article and talkpage

Both the article and talk page have clearly been censored, I had thought wikipedia opposed censorship, I remember a case where a pedophilia image was kept of a page about a band. I'm not going to mention what has been censored, I'm just interested in why it has been censored? this information is in the public domain, if you google the actress's name the first page google results brings up stories by the independent, mail and metro related to the events that have been censored.

If one of the admins etc, who has been censoring this page and the article could explain why they've taken such action, I think that would be helpful and perhaps if there is a genuine reason that people can clearly see it will prevent the re-adding of material that only then has to be censored again.

Happy to discuss — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:DA42:200:65BE:5EEF:A77A:741C (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

It is illegal in the UK to name certain people even under these circumstances — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.37.21 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 21 December (UTC)2017‎

Anonymity is guaranteed for the lifetime of the complainant - http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/34/section/1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.18.171 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

The false accusation in question hasn't been reported in a reliable source. However, if it ever is, Wikipedia's servers are in the US, not the UK, so it can be put in this article. 152.130.15.30 (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

It's because Wikipedia mods love protecting women when they do that particular horrible thing. Same with the Rolling Stone debacle. Everything else is just an excuse. If some random country in the world outlaws something, they're not going to censor the entire international Wikipedia because of that. The same sentiment is why she is immune from consequences for doing it. Andelum (talk) 22:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Mark Pearson

Why is there no mention of her false rape accusation against Mark Pearson? It it legally proven and now belongs on her page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.143.92.33 (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Probably because there are no reliable sources that verify the information. Primefac (talk) 12:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Well, at least the fact that there was a _rumour_ of her being involved _is_ verified? I guess the real reason is because no one wants to get banned the same way they were on Twitter. VZakharov (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

• I checked because I couldn't believe it but Primefac is right. Plenty of RS report it but every one omits her name.

Independent, Telegraph, Telegraph again, NZ Herald, Huffington Post

Orwellian. 103.208.220.143 (talk) 00:55, 4 December 2018 (UTC)