Talk:Sourcing (personnel)

This is without doubt the most poorly-written Wikipedia article I've ever seen. E.g. "The actual act of boss for candidates is performed by either a recruiter (be it an internal corporate recruiter or agency recruiter) or a dedicated recruiter just focused on the sourcing function." That sentence does not even begin to make sense. It reads like a prophesy by Nostradamus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.143.206.239 (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I think of the term sourcing, I usually think of it first in the manufacturing sense. More as the process of obtaining raw materials or other supplies in an effort to assemble a final product. Might it be a good idea to add something to the title of this article that indicates that this is just one type of sourcing? Flipflops30 18:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)flipflops30[reply]

Agreed. I've changed Sourcing to a dismabiguation page, and re-titled this one to reflect the personnel focus. Clicketyclack 16:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In brief, a sourcing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.22.240.218 (talk) 11:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]