Jump to content

Talk:Southern chivalry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments left by AfC reviewers

[edit]
  • Comment: Leaving it up to reviewer if "Southern Chivalry" or "Southern chivalry" would be the correct mainspace title. A lot of the primary sources section it off as "Southern Chivalry", sometimes even including quotation marks, but most of the modern secondary sources just refer to a "code" or "chivalric tradition" as a common noun. Orchastrattor (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 19:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abolitionist caricature of the caning of Charles Sumner
Abolitionist caricature of the caning of Charles Sumner
Created by Orchastrattor (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Orchastrattor (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • This wasn't an article until now?? Long enough for sure, no signs of copyvio, eligible in terms of newness and presentable. For ALT0: Interesting and the source checks out (ooh, Genovese, nice), and the image is nice and relevant too. No QPQ needed here; seems good to go. :) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on the bolds and redirects

[edit]

So I think that "Southern chivalry" and "Cavalier myth" have enough overlap to have them listed as synonyms in the lead as they are now as a simple application of WP:SKYISBLUE, and historians seem to use the two interchangeably (I actually only found the Virginia article through an r/askhistorians thread on reddit where the responder simply referred to them as if they were one and the same), however we don't have any RS specifically stating that "X is equal to Y" so as it stands the "chivalry" and "gentleman" sides of the article are talking about the more general idea of a code of honor, while the "Cavalier" side is more about the specific literary allusions to the English Royalists and directly comparable groups. If anyone finds something on this topic we can simply add it to the lead with a short paragraph on the historiography of the two terms in relation to one another. Orchastrattor (talk) 21:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]