This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
A fact from Southern chivalry appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Comment: Leaving it up to reviewer if "Southern Chivalry" or "Southern chivalry" would be the correct mainspace title. A lot of the primary sources section it off as "Southern Chivalry", sometimes even including quotation marks, but most of the modern secondary sources just refer to a "code" or "chivalric tradition" as a common noun. Orchastrattor (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
This wasn't an article until now?? Long enough for sure, no signs of copyvio, eligible in terms of newness and presentable. For ALT0: Interesting and the source checks out (ooh, Genovese, nice), and the image is nice and relevant too. No QPQ needed here; seems good to go. :) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So I think that "Southern chivalry" and "Cavalier myth" have enough overlap to have them listed as synonyms in the lead as they are now as a simple application of WP:SKYISBLUE, and historians seem to use the two interchangeably (I actually only found the Virginia article through an r/askhistorians thread on reddit where the responder simply referred to them as if they were one and the same), however we don't have any RS specifically stating that "X is equal to Y" so as it stands the "chivalry" and "gentleman" sides of the article are talking about the more general idea of a code of honor, while the "Cavalier" side is more about the specific literary allusions to the English Royalists and directly comparable groups. If anyone finds something on this topic we can simply add it to the lead with a short paragraph on the historiography of the two terms in relation to one another. Orchastrattor (talk) 21:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]