This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles
A fact from Southport Arts Centre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 October 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Bad terms. These are relative and ambiguous. Could it be "Facing the main facade pictured" or some such? I don't mean to be thick, but there is a reason why they have port and starboard on ships and aircraft. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Very sorry, but I just did it the way the experts in the sources do it; they refer to the sides on the main front. I am no expert but have amended the article. Does this please you? It looks over-pedantic to me. And I'm not sure of any connection with ships. But thanks for your interest in the articles, anyway. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And the sources do not say "James Maxwell and Charles Tuk" - that's OR. And anyway, it's Tuke, not Tuk, or do you know something I do not? --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected Tuke. You are right that the sources do not say James Maxwell and Charles Tuke, although those were the names of architects who did work in the area, and I presume that would be them. I have not parsed all the sources and can't say whether that fact tied to this building can be reliably verified. Your changes on the direction are pleasing indeed. Very nice trio of articles, and a triple DYK. Well done. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
