Sparro is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
I've tagged this article for notability concerns, because all of the cited sources are either press releases or lists of award winners. There's nothing discussing the significance of this company in the context of a secondary source. –Darkwind (talk) 10:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi (Darkwind), BandT and Mumbrella are secondary, author-written sources that are the leading marketing websites in Australia. M0z (talk) 05:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@M0z: That may be true, but this mumbrella article is still a cut-and-paste of a press release, meaning it's basically a primary source, and this BandT article is still a mere list of awards, meaning the coverage is not significant. –Darkwind (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Darkwind. Which section do you consider to be an advertisement? please help remove it. Thanks--Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 12:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ավետիսյան91: The entire history section consists of nothing but mentions of awards that the company has won, or similar factoids like being the first at something. It doesn't actually say anything that you would expect to find in a history section, such as the description of why the company was founded, any challenges they might have faced, how they have influenced or changed their industry, etc.
An article that only consists of a brief mention of what a company does and a long list of awards isn't an encyclopedia article, it's hagiography at best, and spammy advertising at worst. –Darkwind (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's more likely to be UPE. I've blocked Ավետիսյան91 for it. MER-C 17:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
