Talk:Spheromak

A fact from Spheromak appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a spheromak is a stable ring of hot plasma that's been described as the electrical equivalent of a smoke ring?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/November.

Wikipedia

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Expansion needed

It is requested that a physics diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

I am thinking that the following sections should be added to the spheromak page:

Theory (needs to elaborated)
Subsection on magnetic field profiles, safety factors and transport in spheromaks.
A section on performance of spheromak should be added. The performance should be tracked over the last 3 decades and should be compared to Lawson Crieterion and other fusion concepts.
A section on "how to create spheromaks" should be added - pulsed electrostatic helicity injection, steady state helicity injection, etc.
A section on existing spheromak experiments (may be under external links).
A section on future challenges

(Would appreciate some help) --DeepakKumar (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good suggestions, too bad this article seems to have languished a bit. I'm not qualified to really help in any of your listed areas, but do think that a reference to the Electron spiral toroid might be included. According to the discussions here, it seems the principals involved agree the "electron sprial toroid" is a special case of a spheromak. Maybe include it in the proposed "existing spheromak experiments" section? Krellkraver (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing article - dual meaning and no diagram

Would be great to better separate the plasma configuation from devices that produce it.
And great if we had a diagram or clear description of the arrangement of currents and fields in the plasma. and a description of the forces on the plasma and how the plasma tends to evolve with time, (does it shrink until stable ?) - Rod57 (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Guys when did the SPHEX shut down? I have papers going to 1999. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C7C0:B940:E198:2E60:A0DC:DE4E (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

create page: strong spheromak (from strong force) or synonymously (same sense/meaning) chromospheromak (from quantum chromodynamics)

The hypothesized chromospheromak replaces the black hole ringularity (thus the "ring" becomes way fatter and its behavior is a way more complicated; a non-idealized mechanism).

The same mechanics used, but with "chromodynamic flow" (a proposed state of matter even more degenerate and energetic than quagma/quark–gluon plasma.

ask Princeton University physicists