Talk:Split-flap display

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	July 22, 2013

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Text-merge?

There is also a page on this same topic at Solari departure board. It should probably be merged with this page. It's basically just a list of existing boards in the US and Britain anyway.
I can see some scope for moving content to a single article on the large display boards using split-flaps, but the displays also have a significant history (and for far longer) as clock displays. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This merge was completed three years ago; thought it worth noting here, and, so, y'all were right there. -- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

incomplete list

If I'm not mistaken the list of transport boards (the bulk of this article, sadly) came over with the merge from the Solari Board article. So at that time it was just Solari boards, not boards of all types, and the list as such is just painfully short. If it were complete, it would be several times longer. Is it even necessary? -- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] Merger Discussion

No consensus to merge, no comments for nearly two months. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Request received to merge articles: Flight information display system into Split-flap display dated November 2015. Discuss here. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 06:29, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose These have only a coincidental overlap. One article is about display technology, one about a commercial application. Both are much wider than the other. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose One definitely about airplanes, this article more train-y? -- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 21:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Andy. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Split-flap display. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131219030803/http://www.segd.org:80/design-awards/index.html to http://www.segd.org/design-awards/index.html#/design-awards/2006-design-awards/a-sign-of-democracy.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Split-flap display. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]