Talk:Squeamishness
Appearance
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by SummerPhDv2.0 (talk · contribs) on 30 May 2019. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Notable?
[edit]Andrew Davidson: WP:DEPROD does say you have the right to remove the prod if you disagree. It strongly encourages you to provide a reason. Why do you feel this perma-stub should be kept?
At present, the article is an unsourced dictionary definition. No subject is notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. - SummerPhDv2.0 21:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps you missed the first ping, Andrew Davidson. WP:DEPROD is not a reason to remove a prod. I haven't found anything notable here. What do you have? - SummerPhDv2.0 16:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- I assume you did have a reason for deprodding this, Andrew Davidson. Please share. - SummerPhDv2.0 20:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)