Jump to content

Talk:Sreenath Bhasi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Keep added citations to the article. --atnair (talk) 01:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent unexplained removals of the "Controversies" section

[edit]

Since October, edits from several Kerala-based IPs in the 117.230.... range have repeatedly attempted to delete this part without explanation:

Kerala Police filed a case against actor Sreenath Bhasi on 23rd September 2022 for allegedly abusing a youtube channel anchor. On the same day Bhasi abused a malayalam radio journalist during a live interview for Red FM.[1][2][3][4] On 26th September 2022 Sreenath bhasi was taken into police custody for questioning in the verbal abuse case. [5][6][7][8]

References

  1. ^ "Case against Sreenath Bhasi for insulting anchor during Chattambi movie interview". OnManorama. Retrieved 2022-09-23.
  2. ^ "Actor Sreenath Bhasi arrested for abusing anchor during movie promo". Onmanorama. 2022-09-26. Retrieved 2022-09-26.
  3. ^ "Police book actor Sreenath Bhasi for allegedly abusing online journalist". English.Mathrubhumi. Retrieved 2022-09-23.
  4. ^ Pandey, Devasheesh (2022-09-23). "Chattambi actor Sreenath Bhasi booked for abusing anchor during movie promotions, netizens divided". www.indiatvnews.com. Retrieved 2022-09-23.
  5. ^ "Actor Sreenath Bhasi taken into police custody for questioning in verbal abuse case". The Hindu. PTI. 2022-09-26. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 2022-09-26.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  6. ^ "Malayalam actor Sreenath Bhasi arrested for allegedly insulting woman anchor". The Indian Express. 2022-09-26. Retrieved 2022-09-26.
  7. ^ "Actor Sreenath Bhasi arrested for misbehaving with anchor during interview". OnManorama. Retrieved 2022-09-26.
  8. ^ "Sreenath Bhasi Arrested After Police Complaint Filed Against Actor for Using Derogatory Words Towards Female Reporter | 🎥 LatestLY". LatestLY. 2022-09-26. Retrieved 2022-09-26.

While the heading of that section ("== Controversies ==") could be improved, the content itself seems well-sourced. Thus, such blanket removals will continue to be reverted until a valid reason is given, cf. WP:RVREASONS. Regards, HaeB (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No official valid case at present since the opposite party has no complaints

[edit]

Though lot of discussions and controversy in picture with reference to instincts , the court confirms no valid case since opposition ye party has no concerns . SnBhasi (talk) 18:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]