Talk:Sri Rajarajeswari Peetam

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sri Rajarajeswari Peetam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Western NY

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Low-importance).

A request to improve the wiki, to add more objectivity[edit]

Hello everyone,

I have just been through this wiki and though it appears to have some information, it has some issues with it. Can you please help improve this wiki? - 1) It appears to have quiet a bit of original information with insufficient objective citations. For instance, There are very few newspaper articles, books or magazines cited. Can someone pls add that, in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines? 2) It appears to have been written more from an ardent devotee's perspective and not like an objective wiki. A lot of it seems to be written in a far too casual tone and not as per Wikipedia guidelines, for example an entire section about a person referred to as aiya. Can someone please help make this wiki more objective?

Any help improving this wiki would be most appreciated. Thank you Notthebestusername (talk) 08:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]