Talk:St Botolph's Church, Quarrington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleSt Botolph's Church, Quarrington is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 26, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 4, 2016Good article nomineeListed
September 13, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 29, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the artist Charles Haslewood Shannon is commemorated by a plaque in St Botolph's Church (pictured) in Quarrington, where his father was rector for nearly 50 years?
Current status: Featured article


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Botolph's Church, Quarrington/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 15:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Lede
  • "hexagons and trefoils into the reticulated" -links here would be useful
I've linked trefoil, and provided a wiktionary link for reticulated. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Construction
  • "to an earlier, now-lost nave." -nave should be linked earlier in first instance and delinked here
Done. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Architecture
  • "Its windows are by H. Hughes and Burlison and Grylls, while another commemorates the Barrett family. Morris and Co. worked on a window in the north aisle.[17]" -do we know when they were installed?
I've added dates for the Hughes, Barrett family and Morris ones; dates for the others are missing, but have been dated in the source to 19th/20th century (vague I know).
  • Some more photographs, particularly interior would be good.
They would, but disappointingly I cannot find any, and I don't live in the area to take any of my own. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Ping me when you've addressed, I made the other small changes myself.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: I have replied to your comments above and altered the article as per these edits. Let me know if anything more is needed. Thank you very much for taking this on—it's greatly appreciated. —Noswall59 (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Looks good for GA, sorry you had to wait so long!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! —Noswall59 (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Botolph's Church, Quarrington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]