Talk:St Cynfarwy's Church, Llechgynfarwy

St Cynfarwy's Church, Llechgynfarwy has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 2, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 28, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although St Cynfarwy was active in Anglesey, Wales, in the 7th century, the age of the church dedicated to him (pictured) cannot be ascertained due to extensive rebuilding?

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	St Cynfarwy's Church, Llechgynfarwy is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Cynfarwy's Church, Llechgynfarwy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 16:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:08, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The prose is mostly reasonably well written, but a few things stood out:

There was a church here before the 15th century, however: the font is from the 12th century, indicating the existence of a church here at that time, and a church was recorded in this location in the Norwich Taxation of 1254. Could this be rephrased so that we do not get three instances of the word "church" in the sentence?

Kennedy's work, which rebuilt the church "almost from the foundations" (in the words of a 2009 guide to the buildings of the region), left no datable features. I think the brackets are redundant here, the commas suffice.

And from the lead: although as of November 2011 there has not been an incumbent priest since September 2009. This phrase is a little clumsy, perhaps something on the lines of "although there has not been an incumbent priest since September 2009."

Thanks for addressing these points. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Sources look good and those that I can access support the statements, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Sufficient coverage without trivia.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
One image used, licensed and captioned. it would be good to get hold of and interior shot is possible (Not a requirement however)
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
~~On hold for seven days fro a few tweaks to the prose. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:25, 1 December 2011 (UTC)~~[reply]

I am happy that the article meets the criteria so it will be listed. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed, I hope. Interior shots would be lovely but unfortunately most Anglesey churches are closed except for services. Bencherlite ^Talk 18:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.