Talk:Stade de Luxembourg

Luxembourg Mid‑importance

	Luxembourg portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rugby union Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Contoversy concerning the name - why delete it ?[edit]

What is the reason to constantly deleting the section about the naming controversy of the stadium ? There are enough quotes that confirm there was a huge controversy concerning the naming of the stadium. I also added your text about how the petition was rejected by the chamber of deputies! So why delete this text ?

Kind regards, Letzebuergerr

As per Wikipedia:Criticism, there is no need for a controversy section, and it seems that by repeatedly trying to include one you are pushing an agenda, which is contrary to WP:NPOV. That there was any criticism of the name is made abundantly clear in the sentence: "In September 2020, the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies rejected a petition to amend the name using the Luxembourgish language." Even that is probably overstating it, because as I gather the petition failed to get enough signatures. Just to give you an idea of how small a "controversy" it was, the official petition to change the name only gathered a total of 1,081 signatures out of the necessary 4,500 signatures required for a proper parliamentary debate. Luxofluxo (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]