Talk:Stagnation point

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

I removed the following questionable passage from the article, and moved it here in case someone wants to try to salvage it:

Also, stagnates is when you have too many afferent ducts of liquid in a compartment and the amount of efferent ducts is less than the incoming. So the liquid stagnates or remain in the compartment for a while. An example of this is on the circulation of the lymph nodes where the lymph stagnates there allowing macrophages and lymphocytes time to carry out protective functions.

The above passage is totally irrelevant to stagnation point. Salih (talk) 12:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong definition of the stagnation point[edit]

Good morning all. Once we accept the "no slip condition", all the particles of a viscous fluid flow in contact with the body have a zero velocity. Your definition of stagnation point is therefore not valid. I had to correct my definition myself (in fr.wikipedia) with this in mind. Best regards, Bernard de Go Mars (talk) 08:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]