Talk:Stamp catalog

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philately High‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference works (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

Catalog / catalogue[edit]

This article uses the word catalog while the one as Stamp collecting uses catalogue. What's Wikipedia's policy regarding US/UK English? JoshXF (talk) 01:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Either is OK as long as used consistently and appropriate to the subject. eg no US spelling in an article about Winston Churchill and no UK spelling in one about Kennedy! Thanks. Maidonian (talk) 02:45, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Selection criteria[edit]

I suppose we should forestall editwarring by deciding some sort of informal criteria for catalogues that are worth mentioning on this page, vs appearing only in List of stamp catalogues. As a first approximation, I would say that any catalogue mentioned on this page ought to have its own article (aka all-blue-links). If no online-only catalogues have their own articles, it would work to simply mention that there are online-only catalogues, and refer readers to the complete list to see which ones there are. Stan (talk) 17:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like WP:WTAF should apply as a basic principle for inclusion, thereby having no redlinks. 20:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Are there any such wars?JoshXF (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the online catalogs section?[edit]

Is there a good reason why the online catalogs section should be apart from the "Current catalogs" section? I suggest they'd be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshXF (talk • contribs) 18:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]