Talk:Start All Over/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    In the lead, "A MuchMusic nominated video to "Start All Over," inspired by randomness, premiered on Disney Channel", I believe that a "the" is needed between "on" and "Disney", that's me. The same thing goes with "The music video to "Start All Over," directed by Marc Webb, was first seen on Disney Channel on December 19, 2007" in the Music video section. In the lead, what do you mean with "inspired by randomness"? In the Music video section, "Several random figures makes appearances" ---> "Several random figures make appearances". In the Live performances section, "On June 7, 2009 at the twentieth annual A Time for Heroes Celebrity Carnival Cyrus", a comma is needed after Carnival.
    Check.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    In the Music video section, please link "skaters" to its correspondence article. In the lead, "and also includes her in a "carnival-like" setting" and "saying it is up-beat and yet "vague", since there are direct quotes in the lead it would be best to add a ref per WP:LEAD and WP:MOSQUOTE.
    Check.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    There's a dead link.
    Check.
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Ipodnano for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]