Talk:State Radio

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

dead link[edit]

Full-length video live at Paradiso (28-09-2006)--Gagameel (talk) 15:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The emphasis on the word "greatly" just caught my eye. Is that normal for wikipedia articles / should it be changed? Just wondering what the standard is for the use of italics on wikipedia.

Matterson52 02:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To categorize by state...[edit]

Where in New England? --Zach Hammond 23:59, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Last Radio[edit]

This says that their upcomming album will be called the last radio. I have not heard this, can you cite the source? 67.86.119.65 (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from "Chad Urmston"??[edit]

Why does Chad Urmston redirect here...? If Brad Corrigan warrants his own article, why shouldn't Chad? If I could get a hold of Chad before his next concert, I might be able to write up a good article...Oh yeah, I'm a personal friend of Chad Urmston. :D I got tix to a concert he held in VA a while back. --HubHikari 03:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think unredirected the article would be best. He's a single person, not the entire band. --Thefirechild 03:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've rectified the problem. --Grahamdubya 18:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV?[edit]

"State Radio is known for their outstanding stage presence, and like to often have the audience join in the fun." I noticed this sentence. It doesn't seem to contribute much other than point of view. Should it be kept?

Fair use rationale for Image:Barnsessions.jpg[edit]

Image:Barnsessions.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Flagshiners.gif[edit]

Image:Flagshiners.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Liveatsync.jpg[edit]

Image:Liveatsync.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PeaceBNations.jpg[edit]

Image:PeaceBNations.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Simmerkane.jpg[edit]

Image:Simmerkane.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Usagainstthecrown.jpg[edit]

Image:Usagainstthecrown.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Us Against the Crown missing...[edit]

Why is Us Against the Crown not listed in the discography?

I second that!DougOfDoom ^talk 20:39, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biography Section[edit]

I removed the opening line "The mixture of indie rock songwriting, socially conscious lyrics, and roots reggae rhythms has long been a staple in the jam band world, and State Radio delivers on all counts," because I felt that it was biased. If there is some way that the actual information in this sentence could be added without the unnecessary opinions, that would be great. Otherwise, I see no reason for it to be in there. Sverez (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree I think its notable throughout Bob Marley, to John Butler, to Matisyahu that those are not uncommon characteristics. It helps to better and more properly portray their genre, providing a better understanding of what their general sound consists of. Jman8 (talk) 12:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.110.189.29 (talk) [reply]

Let It Go U.S. #97 citation needed[edit]

Which chart is Let It Go 97th?--67.86.120.246 (talk) 01:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV tag[edit]

The "Biography" section is written more like a press release or a fansite than an encyclopedic article. It needs a rewrite. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]