Talk:Statistical geography

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Is this really a separate topic?[edit]

Yesterday I changed this stub article into a #redirect to spatial analysis. Today Hesperian has switched it back, and added a little more information. I'm not interested in starting a fight. But I honestly think that "statistical geography" is simply another name for "spatial analysis". So I'd like to get a friendly discussion started here.

I ran a few searches on Google Scholar. Searching the exact phrase "statistical geography" I got 595 hits, including Spatial Analysis: A Reader in Statistical Geography (Prentice-Hall, 1968), and this paper, which was published by the Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis at University College, London; it examines the statistical geography of the internet.

Searching the exact phrase "spatial analysis" on Google Scholar got 52,400 hits. Narrowing this search to those articles that also incorporate the words "statistical" and "geography", I'm still left with 10,500 hits. Here's a quote from page 21 of this publicly accessible article:

By spatial analysis, I mean the analysis of data that have spatial coordinates or geographic locations such as data for electoral precincts, countries, regions, cities, or locational attributes of voters (street address, work location, personal networks, etc).

I submit that "statistical geography" and "spatial analysis" are synonymous terms, and that the Wikipedia article on the subject should appear under the term that is more commonly used. DavidCBryant 14:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's my view that "statistical geography" includes concepts that could not be called "analysis" in any sense, such as the demarcation and naming of geographic areas for statistical purposes. But like you, I have no interest in starting a fight. You seem to have put some effort into establishing your position, so if you're quite certain, revert me; I won't revert again. If you're wrong, sooner or later an expert will weigh in. Hesperian 15:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should rename it to Statistical geography in Australia, with a link to the above spatial analysis article on the first line? If we're to do articles for "Statistical division (Australia)", "Statistical subdivision (Australia)" and "Census collection district (Australia)" (or some appropriate naming convention for the above) it would make sense to have some top level article on the subject. Orderinchaos 16:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would have thought the top-level article for the Australian stuff would be Australian Standard Geographical Classification. Hesperian 05:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anon Commentary: As an interested reader, clarification between these two pages would be helpful. It seems to me that statistically designated areas are a tool of the discipline concerned with the statistical/analytical understanding of geographical/spacial areas. As someone who is specifically looking for the information contained in the article "spacial analysis" the "statistical geography" article was slightly misleading until I found this talk page. I also found it odd that the "statistical geography" page seemed to primarily discuss Australia when I was expecting a discussion of a scientific discipline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.61.186 (talk) 19:45, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geography[edit]

what is the significance of statistics in Geography 102.0.5.67 (talk) 10:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]