Talk:Steam tank

Trucks Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

a notice[edit]

the article should write that it was manufactured by the Stanley motor carriage company (SMCC) that show the constructor name and not only write the "Expertise was called in from...." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.72.100.62 (talk) 05:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

500hp?[edit]

A 500hp steam engine is, like, really powerful. A lot of early steamships didn't have engines that powerful. Usually steam engines are low hp, very high torque. While it is possible to make a high speed, 500hp steam engine, it would be unusual for the era, and it would give the machine a better power to weight ratio than most WWII tanks, easily giving it a top speed of 35mph or so. Are we sure it's not 500hp COMBINED? Even that is hard to believe, but easier than a 1,000hp tank in WWI.

Idumea47b (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see I misread the article, and that it does in fact say that the 500hp rating is combined total. The infobox should be updated to make this more clear. This still works out to roughly three times the power to weight ratio of a Mark IV tank, so why is the top speed roughly the same? A 250hp steam engine is putting put a serious output. I think it more likely that this is boiler horsepower rating or something else, which is not directly comparable to modern horsepower ratings. It is a measure of boiler dimensions, working pressure and heating area, and it usually results in a number significantly higher than the actual rated output of the engine itself.

Idumea47b (talk) 23:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]