Talk:Steen's cane syrup

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

United States: Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Deletion / Notability

steen's is NOT the only manufacturer left today.. article should be deleted & replaced with an article on pure cane syrup, if anything —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.13.109 (talk) 07:15, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. An article about cane syrup without being about a specific company would be better. If such an article is too small, it might be better as a section in one of the articles about sugar. By the way, I changed the name of this section. SlowJog (talk) 03:59, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the sources that talk about cane syrup focus on Steen's, and I think the notability of the product is reasonably clear. I've added some content and sources. Having said that, it might still be better to refocus the article on cane syrup in general, while still using the content about Steen's. In either event, this article is not appropriate for summary deletion under WP:Proposed deletion, which is intended for articles whose deletion is expected to be uncontroversial. I've removed the prod notice, but I am open to the possibility that the article might be renamed to cane syrup and reworded accordingly; in that event the current title Steen's cane syrup would become a redirect to cane syrup, but I think nearly all of the current content would still be usable. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]