Jump to content

Talk:Stefan Krauter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

What’s the justification to create articles for scientists that have not made a substantial contributions to science or technology? He‘s just a random lobbyist for renewable energy and did not change or enhance scientific knowledge in a substantial way.

I would like to know what contributions Krauter made that justify dedicating an article for him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.104.160 (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3 papers with over 100 citations (according to Google Scholar) suggests that he has contributed significantly to scientific knowledge in his area. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem very significant. I'll start the procedure for deletion proposal. Enalya (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]