Talk:Steve Armstrong

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steve Armstrong article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Georgia (U.S. state) Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Steve Armstrong is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Prod tag[edit]

I removed the prod tag from this article, I intend to source it within the next few days, if I cannot find good sources I will personally put it up for AFD. MPJ -DK 09:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now, you need to stop reinserting the material that you were not able to source. The burden of proof is on the person wanting to include the material. Unit Anode 18:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And you need to stop misusing the rules and claim you're within your rights - I'm sure you were allowed to Prod however many articles you had on your list, giving you carte blanche to just disregard the "contentious" portions of the rules is highly doubtful. In fact "burden of proof" wise, it's on you to prove that you're "a special case" in regards to overapplying the rules of sources in BLPs. MPJ -DK 18:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not. The burden clearly lies with the person attempting to reinsert challenged material. I've challenged the material, so source it, or it stays out. Unit Anode 18:22, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you did not "challenge" the material - you just went "oh it's unsourced", apparently the definition of "contentious" has just been stretched to near breaking point. MPJ -DK 18:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm telling you right now, I challenged it. Either source it, or it stays out. Unit Anode 18:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL that definition is about to snap, "i challenge it"... that's precious. MPJ -DK 19:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Precious"? Hardly. It's simply what is supposed to happen. I remove it (read: challenge it), and it's either sourced or stays out. Unit Anode 00:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Question[edit]

Was Steve Armstrong was born in 1964 or 1965? I can't tell because in the box on the right it said 1964 but on the article it said 1965. It's probably appropriate to put a source under which birth year is correct. Minima c94 (talk) 18:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency is key, I must have mistyped when I redid the info box, fixed with a source to verify which is right. MPJ -DK 18:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi are you to day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.190.11.140 (talk) 03:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]