Talk:Steve Jackson (mathematician)
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
delta-one-five
[edit]Doesn't look better than δ15? Kope (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, in some cases it might, but in others it might not. The problem is that the PNG images don't scale with your font size. Try doing a few ctrl + or ctrl - in a row to see what I mean. The PNGs also tend to mess up line spacing more than the HTML. Hopefully there'll someday be a better LaTeX rendering engine than the current PNG-based one, but in the current environment the Math WikiProject has come to a consensus to avoid inline LaTeX except where it's really unavoidable. (LaTeX on a line by itself is fine.) --Trovatore (talk) 19:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Actually ctrl plusses and minusses did not cause scale problems (except that the first version was always a little too large). The point is probably is that my eyes are more hurt by the subscript on the wrong place then by a too large or too small formula. I am aware of the consensus you mentioned and try to follow it. Kope (talk) 06:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)