Talk:Steven J. Miller

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Sworn Statement flagging PA Ballots for fraud[edit]

Some expansion on his history with this subject would be helpful

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/mathematics-prof-says-sworn-statement-many-56000-gop-ballots-pa-may-be

TuffStuffMcG (talk) 14:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Better sources needed, JusttheNews was created in 2020, but the subject S.J. Miller appears to be a notable and we'll regarded person.TuffStuffMcG (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jraudhi (talk • contribs) 01:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying to figure out his analysis in the affidavit, and have asked a few other statisticians. There is a clear math error at the start of it as his totals add up to well over 20,000 whereas he says "almost 20,000" individuals were called. It also is unusual that they only survey Republicans. It would be important to survey all voters to see how widespread the issue they investigated was. It is also the case, that in PA, individuals who voted in a primary election earlier in the year had the option of checking a box to automatically receive a mail ballot in the general. There was an news article about how that caused lots of confusion.

He uses standard statistical methods, but the sampling methodology is probably questionable, and the assumptions they draw from their conclusions and how they interpret the results are probably unjustified.

Jraudhi (talk) 01:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]