This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Did Laureys create his own page? In the section on Rom Houben, it's stated that his brain is functioning almost normally. But the paper cited as being related to his diagnosis (the 2009 BMC Neurology paper) is about patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS) who were misdiagnosed as in a persistent vegetative state (VS), which says that those who had emerged from MCS were excluded from the study. So is Houben in an MCS state or is his brain functioning almost normally? Lippard (talk) 17:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like that may be the case. The article was created by User:Laureys1. Kimen8 (talk) 21:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rom Houben is listed in See Also, which seems perfectly relevant. Though, the description provided in the See also section is: a comatose man incorrectly identified as conscious by Laureys, who made insufficiently rigorous tests of alleged facilitated communication. On Houben's page, though, it says Houben was diagnosed with total locked-in syndrome by Belgian neurologistSteven Laureys in 2006 with the help of modern brain imaging techniques and equipment.. It seems these two are contradictory. This article claims he was comatose and identified as conscious, but Houben's article says he was conscious and identified as comatose. I am going to change the language on this article to match Houben's article, but perhaps someone who knows about this case can clear this up. Kimen8 (talk) 19:33, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It appears Laureys created this article himself: Laureys1. They have not disclosed this in this page's history or on their user talk page. Most of the article at time of writing this is also unsourced. Kimen8 (talk) 21:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There has also been some back and forth and then removal of the mention of the Rom Houben situation from this article; if it is truly deemed not relevant to the article, then that's fine, but I think it is relevant and serves as part of the justification for why this individual is even notable enough to have an article. I think that content should be restored, but the specific wording as it exists in the history seems like it needs some work. Kimen8 (talk) 21:10, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
