Talk:Stevenote/Archive 1

One More Thing

Although I stand behind every word of my description as accurate and precise, I suspect and accept that it probably contains one or more style violations and will need to be rewritten. Frankie

Seriously needs a rewrite, there is some blatant POV in there, and some inaccurate stuff. Shaun Eccles-Smith 09:47, 23 June 2006 (UTC).

Yes, but the paragraph "If a Stevenote fails to include 'One more thing', the media usually considers it to be a major disappointment and a reason for Apple's stock price to drop." is funny enough that I won't be the one to rewrite it :-) Peter S. 19:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Intel Transition

I don't believe the the Intel Transition was a One More Thing. As I recall, prior to his keynote at WWDC 2005, there were many rumors swirling about that Apple was going to being using Intel processors. Deliberately leaked I believe, because early in the keynote a slide was presented that read "It's True" with the 'e' lowered as in Intel's logo. The remainder of the keynote discussed the transition. However towards the end of the keynote Steve did reveal that the presentation had been running on a transition machine. --Somegeekintn 15:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

"one more thing"

Totally wrong. The intel transition was the main focus of the 2005 WWDC speech, and the ipod shuffle, not the video, was the one used in a previous keynote.

Yeah, that's how I remember last year's WWDC. Although the revelation that the keynote demo machine was a transition machine could possibly be counted as a "One More Thing" though I don't believe that exact phrase was used. --Somegeekintn 15:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Expansion plan

Here's a suggestion how the article could be expanded:

1. Intro
2. Style (Presentation style, typical elements and their sequence including "one more thing" etc.)
3. List of Stevenotes (and what was introduced)
4. Cultural impact (if needed)
5. Trivia (if needed)
6. See also
7. External links

Comments? Anybody against it? Peter S. 19:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Things added

Ok, I have Just expanded the article, with a trivia section and a keynotes list, but it needs to be expanded a little bit more.Gumbos 14:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

1. Trivia section-Ready to expand
2. Keynotes List-Ready to expand

Trivia section

I checked with Gumbos, and apparently the trivia section is accurate, however the grammar doesn't seem to be up to par. I tried rewriting it but I don't actually know what Steve Jobs said. Here is what I came up with:

During the 1997 keynote, Steve Jobs announced that Internet Explorer would be the default browser on Macintoshes. However, his announcement was met with booing and even some audience members yelling, "no!". To which Jobs replied, "...".

BadCRC 11:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

This became repetitive, so I've copyedited it: hope it's clear and correct. ..dave souza, talk 13:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

its hard to believe but it did happened in 97... But I think it would be good to actually see the entier presentation of the keynote for reference, is kind of funny if you really play close attention to the internet explorer part of the keynote...Gumbos 02:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, it is an interesting watch, that's for sure. It can be found on Youtube or Google Video. -/- Warren 03:36, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

--J Wheeler (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Stephen G. Wozniak was born on ......., 11th 195.. Steven P. Jobs was born on ......., 24th 195..

What was the name of the company that Steven P. Jobs and Stephen G. Wozniak met? Answer:

In 1974 Was Steve P. Jobs employed?

What company sold the original floating point basic that was used in the original release of the Apple II? --J Wheeler (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

WWDC?

I am kind of confused, is WWDC the same as the macworld keynotes?Gumbos 12:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

This is where Wikipediad comes in handy: Macworld Conference & Expo versus Worldwide Developers Conference --Somegeekintn 15:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

List of Stevenotes

Let's create a list of Stevenotes. Here's a start:

• -1997
  • 1984 ? - 1/24 - Introduction of the Mac
  • 1997 Macworld Boston - 8/6 - Return of Jobs
• 1998
  • 1998 Seybold New York - 3/17 - ?
  • 1998 ? - 5/6 - "Back on track"
  • 1998 WWDC - 5/11 - ?
  • 1998 Macworld New York -7/8 - iMac introduced
• 1999
  • 1999 Macworld San Francisco - 1/7 - ?
  • 1999 Macworld Tokyo - 2/21 - ?
  • 1999 WWDC where? - 5/10 - ?
  • 1999 Macworld New York - 7/21 - Noah Wylie
  • 1999 Seybold San Francisco - 8/31 - ?
  • 1999 Special Event where? - 10/5 - ?
• 2000
  • 2000 Macworld San Francisco - 1/5 - Aqua, G4 Cube.
  • 2000 Macworld New York - 7/19 - ?
  • 2000 Apple Expo Paris - 9/13
• 2001
  • 2001 Macworld San Francisco - 1/9 - iTunes, ?
  • 2001 Macworld Tokyo - 2/22 - ?
  • 2001 ? - 5/1 - iBook introduced
  • 2001 Macworld New York - 7/18 - ?
  • 2001 Special Event San Francisco? - 10/23 - iPod
• 2002
  • 2002 Macworld San Francisco - 1/8 - ?
  • 2002 Special Event where? - 1/10 - "The Power of X"
  • 2002 WWDC San Jose, 5/6 - "Funeral of Mac OS 9",
  • 2002 WWDC? - 5/14? - XServe
  • 2002 Macworld New York - 7/16 - ?
  • 2002 Apple Expo Paris - 9/10 - ?
• 2003
  • 2003 Macworld San Francisco - 1/7 - iMovie, iPhoto, iDVD, and iTunes combined into "iLife" package; Keynote (presentations software package); AirPort Extreme; 12" and 17" Aluminum PowerBooks.
  • 2003 Special Event San Francisco? - 1/8 - "The Power of X, 2003"0
  • 2003 NAB where? - 4/7
  • 2003 Special Event where? - 4/28 - iTunes Music Store introduced
  • 2003 WWDC San Francisco - 6/23 - iSight, Power Mac G5
  • 2003 Apple Expo Paris - 9/16 - ?
  • 2003 Event? Where? - 10/16 - iTunes for Windows introduced
• 2004
  • 2004 Macworld San Francisco - 1/6 - iLife '04; GarageBand (music composition/loop assembly program, part of iLife '04); iPod mini
  • 2004 Apple Expo London - 6/15 - ?
  • 2004 WWDC San Francisco - 6/28 - Apple Cinema Display
  • 2004 Apple Expo Paris - 8/31 - iMac G5
  • 2004 Special Event where?? - 10/26 - ?
• 2005
  • 2005 Macworld San Francisco - 1/11 - iLife '05; iWork '05 (new office suite consisting of Pages [word processor] and latest version of Keynote); iMovie HD; Mac mini, iPod shuffle.
  • 2005 WWDC San Francisco - 6/6 - Intel Transition
  • 2005 Special Event where? - 9/7 - iPod Nano
  • 2005 Special Event where? - 10/12 - iPod Video
• 2006
  • 2006 Macworld San Francisco - 1/10 - iLife/iWork '06; iWeb (new WYSIWYG web site creation tool, part of iLife); Podcasting support in GarageBand (part of iLife); first Intel machines: iMac, MacBook Pro.
  • 2006, WWDC San Francisco, August 7(?) - Mac Pro
  • 2006, "It's Showtime," San Francisco, 9/12 - Movies sold on iTunes Store, 5.5th-generation video iPod (30/80 GB), 2nd-generation iPod nano, iTV set-top media box (later renamed Apple TV).
• 2007
  • 2007, Macworld San Francisco - January 9 - AppleTV, iPhone, Paramount joins iTunes Movie Store lineup.

This should be pretty complete, but many details are missing - any takers? Welcome to just edit my post here. Cheers, Peter S. 01:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC), Peter S. 23:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

I struck out the Apple Expo Paris 2004 keynote. That was done in its entirety by Phil Schiller due to Jobs's illness at the time. -/- Warren 00:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! Peter S. 00:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Filled in some missing details. Also, struck the 2003 Power of X talk - this was done by Phil Schiller. DBurr 18:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

BTW I recently found a huge archive of Keynote videos. As I watch them (historical research, man!) I'll fill in additional details and correct any errors that I see. DBurr 19:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Great! I think the plan should be to create a good list here and then add it to the article. Peter S. 16:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposal

It's the same as Reality Distortion Field - no real reason for this article... I think info from this article should be included in Steve Jobs --Have a nice day. Running 21:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose - The man Steve Jobs, the Reality Distortion Field and the Stevenotes are three things quite different. -- Henriok (talk) 15:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think this article should really exist, but if you must, it probably should be in the article about Macworld and/or the Apple Worldwide Developer Conference. —SterlingNorth (talk) 09:30, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose - Steve Jobs is an extrodinary speaker and presenter and has created the standard in which ALL "powerpoint" presentations are measured. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.166.137 (talk) 00:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• support it just doesn't need its own article. i doubt they count as notable 81.96.160.6 (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Support. I know I'm just an anon IP, but doesn't it seem a little strange that we'd have an article about Steve Jobs, then an article about his speeches, with a cute nickname for them based on his name, and then - this is the silliest of all - we have an article about a fictional phenomenon related to Jobs, again cutely named, when it's pretty clear that both of these things should be lumped into the Steve Jobs article, as a subsection called "Speeches" and into a trivia section (or the trash can), respectively. Reality Distortion Field, indeed. We don't need a Wikipedia distortion field, so let's restrain Steve Jobs's wonderful cult of personality to the one article, and try not to have fawning, cutesy, unencyclopedic stuff ALL over the place. 70.100.88.251 (talk) 22:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
• Support merge. Steve Jobs is the phenomenon. The 'Stevenote' is an artifact of same. If I'm not mistaken, no source article mentions 'Stevenote' - the acid test of whether the article deserves an independent existence. Ohconfucius (talk) 06:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
• 'Support' I really see no reason for this article. There is no "unique" thing discussed here. This article simply discusses Steve Jobs for which there already exists an article and in which the content here could pretty much be copied un-edited. 74.170.252.213 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC).
• 'Oppose' the term coined after Steve Jobs is far beyond the context of Steve Jobs. I have seem this term so many times and being used in so many contexts that I never imagined it had something to do with Jobs. If Wikipedia were to merge the articles just because the term has been coined after him, then we should merge hundreds of other articles which fall on the same case. Rgiusti (talk) 16:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
• 'Oppose' RDF is not just a term used with Steve Jobs. One can use it universally for any kind of situation where people act like zombies. So please do NOT merge it. Thanks. --85.176.228.62 (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
• Support The previous two opposers do raise valid points beyond fanboism, but presumably any interested party could still search for reality distortion field and find it in the Steve Jobs article, or we could (gasp!) just redirect. Having its own URL is not reason enough for it to have its own URL, unless we particularly enjoy circular reasoning. Rogerborg (talk) 17:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
• 'Oppose' I think the fact that the term RDF is used to frequently in unrelated contexts does give it the right to have its own article, but if this is the rationale, the article needs to rise to it. While origin is important, if we're really suggesting its something greater that Steve, there should be more content about the phenomenon itself, other notable uses/examples, public opinion, etc. Powrtoch (talk) 03:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
• 'Support' Unlike RDF (which I've seen applied to Bush, Obama, et al), Stevenote is a term that can only apply to one specific situation (big public unveiling of new product) and one specific person (Lord Steve). We can always un-merge the term if (for example) everyone in the world simultaneously takes hallucinogens, allowing some other Steve (Ballmer? Messick? Austin?) to give a series of mind-bending speeches. - Frankie (talk) 18:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
• 'Oppose' I just saw 'RDF' used in a discussion that had nothing to do with Steve Jobs. I couldn't find out what it meant, so I Googled it to no avail. No one else on the forum knew what it referred to. So I went to Wikipedia ... and got my answer! This is exactly the kind of reliable info I expect from WP. If it had been inside the Jobs article, I probably never would have found it. Also, it's use in discussions that don't relate to Jobs indicates that it deserves it's own article.

This is not Talk:RDF

Umm, hello? If you want to keep RDF as a separate page, perhaps you should post your OPPOSE messages in the correct place? - Frankie (talk) 18:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Onemorething.jpg

Image:Onemorething.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm calling WP:N-igans.

Famous people give keynote addresses all the time, and many follow a set format. What makes Steve Job's keynotes any more notable than any other person's? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toad of Steel (talk • contribs) 14:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Because no one else in the world gets 164000 page results using the nickname for the way they give speeches. However, I do agree that making it a section of the Steve page is a perfectly valid solution. - Frankie (talk) 20:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

File:SteveNote.png may be deleted

I have tagged File:SteveNote.png, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 08:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Regarding July 16th Press Conference

Portion of the conference was presented in the keynote style format. I am thinking about editing about the latest stevenote that Steve presented to the one regarding iPhone antenna reception.

Should I proceed, or don't bother editing, since it's not considered a keynote? (Bentoman (talk) 22:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC))

Events presented by Tim Cook

Since Tim Cook became CEO, and delivered the first keynote on October 4, should the article be continued to be updated with Tim Cook's keynote, or should we simply rename the article as Stevenote, and just keep the article for keynote presented by Steve Jobs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentoman (talk • contribs) 21:06, 4 October 2011 (UTC)