Jump to content

Talk:Stewart Cink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


PROTECT

[edit]

This article needs to be protected! Deadspin.com just posted a blog encouraging people to vandalize this article! Faethon Ghost (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No wonder the article is semi-protected. I was mystified that so many people are vandalizing this article, which doesn't seem like it's very popular article. I guess there were lots of Tom Watson fans who were outraged that Stewart Cink beat him, so they decided to vandalize Stewart Cink's article.[1]Pinkgirl34 00:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was the 138th Open, not the 183rdRams87 (talk) 03:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making the introduction look like amateur hour.

[edit]

There is no excuse for this. You have a four paragraph introduction, one of the paragraphs is totally dedicated to the fact he beat Tom Watson in a four-hole playoff. You therefore do not need to mention this in the opening line. Make a choice, either keep it in the first line and delete the paragraph or keep it out of the opening and just leave the paragraph. You can't have both, it looks absolutely ridiculous and like you haven't bothered to check it correctly. It's absolutely exasperating having to keep correcting this all the time. Use some sodding logic and stop assuming everyone who edits without a username is a vandal. Braindead, absolutely braindead.

You clearly did not read the whole lead section. I have now removed the duplication again, this time from the end of the second paragraph. wjematherbigissue 15:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, I can't believe I missed that. To have the same information three times in the space of four paragraphs was utterly inexcusable.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stewart Cink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archive link doesn't get to the desired data. Tewapack (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]