Talk:Stoney Cove

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Swimming

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Scuba diving Low‑importance

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Scuba divingWikipedia:WikiProject Scuba divingTemplate:WikiProject Scuba divingSCUBA articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Categorisation[edit]

The quarry has been categorised as Category:Visitor attractions in Leicestershire, and considering that divers do travel some distance to dive there, it probably is reasonable to call it a "visitor attraction". However, for some unfathomable reason, the category has now been merged into Category:Tourist attractions in Leicestershire, and there's by stretch of the imagination could it be considered a "tourist attraction". It simply does not attract tourists. Put it another way: nobody doing a grand tour of the East Midlands is going to stop off at Stoney Cove as one of the sites they must see.

The categories are not identical, but if there's consensus to merge the two, that's up to those who decided it. Nevertheless, there's no consensus to call Stoney Cove a "tourist attraction", and I think it reasonable to ask those who are doing so to please desist or to adduce sources that justify your edit. --RexxS (talk) 16:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]