Talk:Storm Ossetia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ossetia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OssetiaWikipedia:WikiProject OssetiaTemplate:WikiProject OssetiaOssetia articles

Military history: European / Russian & Soviet C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

"Russian Militias in the Russian invasion of Ukraine"[edit]

This is the second militia that I have made a page for recently, and it has gotten me thinking to make a central page for all these militias, similar to the Russian people's militias in Ukraine page. That way we can include militias which aren't notable enough to be free-standing, and also talk about the context of these various either volunteer, penal, or mercenary militias that the Russian military uses. Does anyone think this would be a good idea? I want to make sure the move would be supported before I start work on this large undertaking. Scu ba (talk) 11:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea. AbominableIntelligence (talk) 08:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've started the article here feel free to help me flesh it out. Scu ba (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

«destruction»[edit]

The unit was never destroyed or encircled. They even made a video denying those claims

https://t.me/Ukr_G_M/20840 89.132.8.125 (talk) 12:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does it make sense to create an article based on the data of the NATO western bloc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.111.119.54 (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

source: telegram

come back when you have an actual article written disproving what three articles said. Scu ba (talk) 00:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your sauce: charter97, a hohol news network that literally posted a screenshot FROM TELEGRAM.

So why is that "true" but not the video from literal soldiers of the unit? Hypocrisy at best 87.242.26.66 (talk) 08:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ah slurs, how civilized and enlightening of a conversation this is. Scu ba (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

«Neutral point of view»[edit]

All sources in this articles are from fringe pro ukrainian web sites — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirkk 123 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Outright false, the ISW is American, charter 97 is Belarusian, and Novinite is Bulgarian. Scu ba (talk) 01:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sure, ISW founder is Victoria Nulands sister in law and charter 97 is a Belarus anti goverment organisation Dirkk 123 (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Kagans founded the ISW in 2007, Nulands was named acting secretary of state in Janurary of 2023. Not sure what you are getting at here. Not sure how Charter97 being an opposition newspaper discredits them. Scu ba (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]