Talk:Strategion

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Strategion appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 May 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that while going to the Strategion in Constantinople, Emperor Theodosius II was attacked with stones by a hungry mob?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Strategion.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 11:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that while going to the Strategion in Constantinople, Emperor Theodosius II was attacked with stones by a hungry mob?

Source: At this time, while the Emperor Theodosious [II] was in procession to the public granaries, he was pelted with stones by a hungry populace... Westbrook (2013), p. 10

ALT1: ... that the merchants of sheep were allowed to sell their livestock in the Strategion in Constantinople until the first day of Lent? Source: C'est au Strategion...que les merchands de moutons peuvent vendre leurs betes, et cela jusqu'au premier jour de careme. Janin (1950), p. 96
Reviewed: Fang Gan

Created by Alessandro57 (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 80 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Alex2006 (talk) 07:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

The article was created yesterday, so is new enough. It is much more than long enough and properly uses in-line citations. AGF on proper paraphrasing of the offline sources was used. Both hooks are interesting and cited in-line, with the first one being better I think (though perhaps need some commas?). The only thing holding up this review, Alessandro57, is that the QPQ hasn't been done yet. Silver seren^C 21:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you're still editing, Alessandro57. Were you planning on doing a QPQ review or is this nomination abandoned? Silver seren^C 23:46, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, of course I am planning a QPQ. I am still recovering from last month's two QPQ per hook ... ;-) Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 03:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review done, Silver seren. Alex2006 (talk) 05:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to go! Silver seren^C 19:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alessandro57 and Silver seren: There are an awful lot of single sentence paragraphs, which should be avoided per WP:PARAGRAPH - granted 'presentable' is nebulous to the point of otiosity but I think some of these can be knocked together.--Laun chba ller 21:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Silver seren and Launchballer: You were right, done! Alex2006 (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My objection has been resolved.--Laun chba ller 09:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]