This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Instead of being quick to hit the revert button all the time, Anoopspeaks, you need to explain why a sub-section is necessary for such a short cast list. Do you think readers won't understand that Tamannah and Varun have special appearances if they don't see it in a separate sub-section? WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO applies. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Krimuk2.0 A section facilitates the easy identification of cameo actors and treats them as special, even though the list may be short now, it could expand upon the film's release. From my observation, some new articles elevate cameo artists higher or even to the main cast, making a subsection a hindrance if editors aim to prioritize cameo artists in the cast order for suspicious reasons. While you may argue it's illogical, it's my opinion; let other editors decide. Furthermore, I found it misleading to suggest that boldface was your primary concern. Anoop Bhatia (talk) 07:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]