Talk:Streptococcus equinus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposing merge from junior synonym Streptococcus bovis to accepted name Streptococcus equinus[edit]

References

  1. ^ POYART (C.), QUESNE (G.) and TRIEU-CUOT (P.): Taxonomic dissection of the Streptococcus bovis group by analysis of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) sequences: reclassification of 'Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli' as Streptococcus lutetiensis sp. nov. and of Streptococcus bovis biotype II.2 as Streptococcus pasteurianus sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2002, 52, 1247-1255.
  2. ^ FARROW (J.A.E.), KRUZE (J.), PHILLIPS (B.A.), BRAMLEY (A.J.) and COLLINS (M.D.): Taxonomic studies on Streptococcus bovis and Streptococcus equinus: description of Streptococcus alactolyticus sp. nov. and Streptococcus saccharolyticus sp. nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 1984, 5, 467-482.
  3. ^ WHILEY (R.A.) and KILIAN (M.): International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the taxonomy of staphylococci and streptococci. Minutes of the closed meeting, 31 July 2002, Paris, France. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2003, 53, 915-917. Minutes of the closed meeting, 31 July 2002, Paris, France in IJSEM Online
  4. ^ Schlegel L.; Grimont R.; Ageron E.; Grimont P.A.D.; Bouvet A. (2003). "Reappraisal of the taxonomy of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex and related species: description of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus subsp. nov., S. gallolyticus subsp. macedonicus subsp. nov. and S. gallolyticus subsp. pasteurianus subsp. nov". International Journal of Systemic Evolution and Microbiology. 53 (3): 631–645. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02361-0. PMID 12807180.
  • Oppose - Looking at the fourth reference you give above, the most recent study (2003), it does not state that they are synonymous, as far as I can see, but that they are both part of a species complex. I suggest we leave the articles as they are. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Closing, given the uncontested objection. Klbrain (talk) 22:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved