Talk:Strong electrolyte

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Strong electrolytes has good conductivity[edit]

I was surprise that someone (apparently has no id) completely changed the article. Strong electrolytes are good source of conductivity and every textbook states that it is true. I hope no people have "tricked" by this (especially students). 20:34, 14 October 2013 (MDT)

how do we know whether a given compound is a strong electrolyte or weak?[edit]

See Strong acid and Dissociation constant (these concepts should be worked into the article).--Kkmurray (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you read the article you'll note it already mentions Strong acids and while it doesn't mention Dissociation constant it does mention Dissociation which gets the "reader" to the right concepts. I'm not saying this is a great article and I have no personal stake in it since I've never worked on it. I'm just taking this moment to remind you that it would worth while to read articles before editing/commenting on them.--OMCV (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the redundant 'see also' links; I missed those on my to-quick read of the article. I also removed the stub tag since the article seems to have moved beyond that stage. --Kkmurray (talk) 03:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lowering of vapor pressure[edit]

A strong electrolyte does not necessarily lower the vapor pressure of the solution. If the electrolyte is volatile (e.g., HCl), it may actually increase the vapor pressure.--Cheminterest (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

greenhair was here with electrolyte powers. deeshum deeshum —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omgblah (talkcontribs) 15:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citric Acid is strong?[edit]

What? It says that citric acid is a strong electrolyte, when it is really is weak! http://chemistry.about.com/od/acidsbases/a/strengthacids.htm Citric acid — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llightex (talkcontribs) 14:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]