Talk:Stuttering therapy/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Hello. I will be doing the GA review for this article. Here are some suggestions for improvement:

As the user above pointed out, the cleanup banner qualifies this article for quickfail. However, I'm in a good mood today, so I'll give you a chance to fix the problem in the " on hold" period. :)
"and these have been successful to varying degrees" - grammar - these what?
In Goals, you talk about what "others" believe. Are these individuals qualified clinicians or psychologists or some hacks on the street?
In the summary of the acronym MIDVAS, the numbering isn't needed.
Refs 25 and 26 are the same, so they can be combined.

That's it for now. The article will remain on hold for seven days for improvements. Nikki311 00:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If this is considered a serious psychology article (rather than pop psychology), please consider evaluating the reference sources according to Wikipedia:Reliable sources (medicine-related articles). Thanks, —Mattisse (Talk) 01:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The seven days are up, and I am failing the article due to lack of progress. Please consider addressing these concerns before renomination. Thanks. Nikki311 15:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]