Talk:Subspecies (film series)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Successful good article nomination
[edit]I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 7, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Good enough for GA at this point, could certainly use a bit of copyediting and I would suggest a peer review going forward. Very minor issues - a few sentences could be improved specifically regarding overuse of commas and/or longer sentences in general with awkward phrasing, which could be considered to be split apart, or just tweaked a bit.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout to acceptable sources.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Article covers many aspects of the film series, and is organized with good structure.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Article appears to be presented in a neutral tone.
- 5. Article stability? No issues present on talk page, no problems in article edit history going back a few months, except for some minor IP-edits to keep an eye on.
- 6. Images?: 2 fair-use images with satisfactory fair-use rationale, however consider standardizing the image pages using a template like {{Non-free use rationale}}.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 05:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)