Talk:Subvertising/Archives/2015
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Wacky Packages
Are 1970s solitary vice "wacky packages" considered a form of subvertising? Or does the term only apply when the implementation is in a nonprophet context?
The Wacky Packages were intended to be more humorous than subversive. Since they didn't have any political agenda, they shouldn't be included. --Wasabe3543 06:45, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
what about this political poster from the 2000 campaign?
--20.4.32.205 21:42, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)