Talk:Sukhna Lake

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chandigarh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Lakes

	Lakes portal Sukhna Lake is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WP:INDIA Banner/Chandigarh workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Chandigarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Chandigarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 06:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article has disputed neutrality[edit]

This article, especially in the 'Local lore' section has disputed neutrality. Please help the view point to make it neutral and not like an advertisement or a tourist brochure.

Kashisharora11 (talk) 12:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation for POL 150C2-III[edit]

The article appears to be pretty clear on concise with its data. It has a number of references, but when clicking on some of them (particularly references 3 and 4), they do not lead to anything. They either need to be updated or the information needs to be replaced. I also think some of the references (such as reference 6 which is a tribute page to P R Mishra) are not fully neutral. Other than that, there was mentioning of a 'Siberian duck" in the article and I think that should be linked to its own Wikipedia page (if it exists) because I don't think many people are familiar with that animal.StevenMadden (talk) 04:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]