Talk:Sumner College

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Unused "general references"

Atlantic306 is edit-warring to retain three external links in the "References" section of this article. He or she claims that these are "general references showing the college exists and has been reported in reliable sources." The documents use reference templates but they're not references for any information in this article; they're just external links. Our guidelines on external links provides excellent guidance on this issue: "If the website or page to which you want to link includes information that is not yet a part of the article, consider using it as a source for the article, and citing it." ElKevbo (talk) 18:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Youre edit warring you made a bold edit by removing all references which I reverted then you reverted again which is edit warring which I reverted. General references mean references without citations, and they prove the existence of the college and are not external links. Removing references in this way is disruptive. If you disagree start an RFC Atlantic306 (talk) 18:11, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Salem News Headlines press release is the same one that's at Get News, per the archived copy. I've removed it as redundant. —C.Fred (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I couldn't access it at all, and internetarchive seems to have stopped working for me at least Atlantic306 (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The same press release also ran in the Trenton Chronicle. —C.Fred (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Have removed it, I still think were better with the one ref than none at all as now it is cited inline Atlantic306 (talk) 18:42, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undiscussed removal of "for-profit" adjective

Stevehovey, a single-purpose account who has exclusively edited this article for the past 7 years, has removed the adjective "for-profit" from the lede of this article several times. This information is well-sourced and critical to include in the lede. Removing it, especially without any discussion or attempt at communication (they have never used an edit summary or posted to a Talk page), is unacceptable.

Continuing this behavior will likely lead to a block. ElKevbo (talk) 13:18, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]