Talk:Sun Tzu/GA2
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Following the nomination of this article for Good Article Reassessment, I shall review it against the good article criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- I reformatted a few citations.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I can find no good reason why this article should have been listed for reassessment, and no reason was provided by the nominator User:P. S. Burton. Maintain GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: