Talk:Suns in alchemy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Suns in alchemy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Occult

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Untitled[edit]

The allusions to Heraclitus and Empedocles are somewhere between the worlds of "Citation needed" and "What the hell?". One would be hard pressed to find any actual reference to alchemy in their works, much less Heraclitus' supposed use of alchemical terms that didn't exist for at least a millenium to come. It should be noted that the theory of all important philosophers being alchemists in disguise is highly controversial to say the least. To preserve a modicum of quality standards even in an obscure esoteric stub, I will take the liberty of deleting these references entirely, until a good citation is found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.207.1.157 (talk • contribs)

Maybe a link to a page about alchemical color stages would be helpful. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.134.130.112 (talk) 01:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Ficinus is not quite correct. I can't find it nor in Theatrum Chemicum, nor in Bibliotheca Chemica Curiosa (which is published at 1702 in Geneve). The English page in the reference does not seem to be very serious. Hugo.arg (talk) 12:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blackholed son[edit]

Samesies? 2607:FB91:20B:A381:5875:26C2:6547:2FBD (talk) 20:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]