Jump to content

Talk:Super Bowl commercials/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General comments[edit]

This should be changed for all uses to avoid wordy sentences.
 Done JParksT2023 (talk) 14:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This should also be changed for all uses.
 Done JParksT2023 (talk) 14:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
References
I think you removed a reference; now the numbers don't match but yes, #222 and #223.
 Done JParksT2023 (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Currently at #19, #21, #22, #108, #110, and #152.
 Done JParksT2023 (talk) 14:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also replace the "(subscription required)" template for "|url-access=subscription".
    • Where is this used?
Reference #155.
 Done JParksT2023 (talk) 14:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·