Talk:Supreme Court of Tasmania

Australia: Tasmania / Law Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Supreme Court of Tasmania is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It's a start

Hey, new user, hoping to get involved in the Australian Law project - my first edits and changes. Added in some more information but obviously needs a clean up and plenty more added. Any help grateful received. Added composition of the Court - need to add more details about what it does, where it is, etc. - MojoTas 06:24, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of current judges

One source of frustration for me has been that we have two lists of judges for each supreme court, a list of current judges on the court page and a complete "List of Judges of the Supreme Court of X". When there is a change, it requires maintaining both lists with the possibility of differences between them. I have been looking to see if there is a way to maintain one list for both & so have been looking at transclusion. The Composition of the Court now includes the code {{:List of Judges of the Supreme Court of Tasmania}} The list then utilises the tags <noinclude></noinclude> to exclude non-current judges & the redundant column "Appointment ended". It's a bit more complex than that, but I will provide detailed instructions if consensus is to implement this across each of the supreme court, federal court etc pages. I will post a comment on the other court's talk pages, but inviting people to comment here. At this stage I am looking for feedback, whether positive or negative, comments and questions. Find bruce (talk) 10:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]