This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
I removed the notability tag, because I don't quite understand the problem. Could someone explain to me why this article doesn't meet the notability guidelines, and, say, the SlySoft one does? I see no evidence of 'significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject' for that article either. There are many more articles that have the same issue.
Mistakes in other articles abound. However, all articles should have secondary sources. A secondary source could be as simple as a link to a review of their product or a newspaper article on them. Blast Ulna (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, well I've added a secondary link now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jez9999 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please help this orphan article by adding links to it in related articles and lists. Once it has an incoming link from at least one article or list, the orphan tag can be removed (disambiguation pages, redirects and draft articles do not count). Three or more incoming links are ideal. The Find link tool may help, but not in all cases.
