Talk:Sureth

Disputed

I do not agree with this article. This page should be a disambiguation page linking to a number of Christian Eastern Neo-Aramaic varieties. We have articles on these varieties, many of which use ܣܘܪܬ or ܣܘܪܝܬ as the name for themselves. As a disambiguation page, it can say this and then list the various varieties. Basically, there is no one 'Sureth'. — Gareth Hughes (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

I concur with Gareth's expertise. There is no unique content here. (Taivo (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC))

The article has been modified turning it more into a disambiguation page and taking into account that 'Sureth' is not the vocable commonly used by western scholars but by its speakers, including English-speaking ones. Other names referring to it have been mentioned.Cimsam (talk) 19:31, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

What happened to the disambiguation page? (Taivo (talk) 21:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC))

If no one minds I will turn this into a dab linking to Assyriac, Chaldean and Turoyo languages. A good old fashioned redirect to Syriac language makes more sense to me since we usually redirect pages with a -ܝܬ suffix to their emphatic forms at Aramaic wiki, so ܣܘܪܐܝܬ is simply redirected to ܠܫܢܐ ܣܘܪܝܝܐ.--Rafy talk 22:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

This article should not have a language info box

This article should not have a language info box since it does not refer to a specific language, but to a name used by speakers for a variety of different Neo-Aramaic languages. It isn't an identifiable language and it certainly shouldn't be carrying Chaldean Neo-Aramaic's ISO 639-3 tag. (Taivo (talk) 04:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC))

I concur with Taivo's point of view. Cimsam (talk) 16:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)