Talk:Surprise (clipper)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

United States: Old West Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as Low-importance).

Delano connection?

Surprisingly, the article itself does not with a single word cover the fact that President Roosevelt's maternal grandfather shipped opium using Surprise, or that Sara Roosevelt herself voyaged on the ship. CapnZapp (talk) 17:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Section deletion

I have deleted the section: Influence on British clipper ship building. This is because it appears to be based on contemporary national jingoism that was fed by the PR of American clipper owners who were looking for business. The separate and parallel development of British and American clippers is well summed up by Howard I. Chapelle in the foreword to David MacGregor's book Fast Sailing Ships. This says, in part "...The claims that English designs were influenced by American principles are completely exploded."

I think the authority of the 2 great technical maritime historians working on the subject of clipper ships, one American and the other British, is sufficient to deal with remarks made in passing (WP:CONTEXTMATTERS) from a book written in 1896, without the benefit of any detailed historical research. In short, the deleted text is simply untrue.ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]