Talk:Suspicious Minds

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elvis Presley (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elvis Presley, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elvis PresleyWikipedia:WikiProject Elvis PresleyTemplate:WikiProject Elvis PresleyElvis Presley articles

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Removal of infobox[edit]

one cover version shouldn't have any advantage over others unless tremendous, so i've deleted the gareth gates one from boxes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.98.165.130 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 2 June 2007

I'm not quite sure what you mean by an "advantage". The Gareth Gates single, since it hit #1 in the UK, would typically have its own article (as per WP:MUSIC), but usual practice on Wikipedia (for a cover version that was that successful) is to include information about it in the general article about the song. The cover versions by Pete Yorn, Tool, and the others did not chart and so do not have their own infoboxes. --Paul Erik 21:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Occurs to me that the abovementioned cover receives unnecessary expore. Never heard of a Gareth Gates, and certainly hasn't entered my fairly large collection of re-makes. My suggestion is that it be toned down. imfred (talk) 12:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WYGG.jpg[edit]

Image:WYGG.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Elvissuspicious minds.jpg[edit]

Image:Elvissuspicious minds.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lead sntence with "originating" and "thematize"[edit]

The statment has a valid reference. Please try alternate wordings of the sentence to make it more acceptable. Steve Pastor (talk) 17:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear wording[edit]

What is this supposed to mean?

"Also in the same were recorded "I'll Hold You In My Heart (Till I Can Hold You In My Arms)", "Without Love (There Is Nothing)", and "I'll Be There". on August 7, was again overdubbed to stereo and mono in Las Vegas, where the final master was produced."

I'd fix it if I could guess what it meant. Any takers?

Also, the In The Ghetto Wiki entry refers to Suspicious Minds, but In The Ghetto is not mentioned in the Suspicious Minds entry:

"In the Ghetto" was recorded during Presley's session in the American Sound Studio in Memphis, Tennessee. It was Presley's first creative recording session since the '68 Comeback. Other hits recorded at this session were "Suspicious Minds", "Kentucky Rain", and "Don't Cry Daddy".Guyburns (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear wording, indeed![edit]

Was this article written in , or translated to, English? Atrocious. Many missing modifiers, for an alliterative start. 24.14.95.248 (talk) 00:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Suspicious Minds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]