Jump to content

Talk:Sutton Valence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image volumes...

[edit]

‎Ukiws, I've reverted the addition of large numbers of images again - it is worth looking at WP:NOTIMAGE, among other pages, for the background to this. Five images in a section with only five, stubby paragraphs, for example, simply creates what is called a "sandwiching" of text between the large number of images, all of which are simply images of local pub signs, and not mentioned as being exceptional in the text. Hchc2009 (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sutton Valence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sutton Valence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sutton Valence and East Sutton

[edit]

In this article I read that East Sutton CP is a neighboring parish. But in the Article on East Sutton I read that the inhabitants of East Sutton are included in the civil parish of Sutton Valence. To my Continental brain, that looks paradox. Ordnance Survey shows an "East Sutton Road", but it doesn't show a place name "East Sutton" in any scale.--Ulamm (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is East Sutton only something like an Irish townland, instead of a civil parish?--Ulamm (talk) 21:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]