Talk:Suzanna Hupp

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

intro

How can she be recognized "worldwide" as an advocate for the second amendment of the United States constitution? or did somebody forget about there's a world outside the 50 states?--76.20.145.31 04:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Repaired. Arthurrh 23:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. 76.20.145.31's argument is fallacious. I live in the UK and I recognise her. The outside world does take an interest in the US constitution and second amendment. 195.59.90.123 (talk) 10:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Describing her as an "advocate for the Second Amendment" is POV. Aside from the grammatical issue, many people support the Second Amendment who do not favor permissive gun-ownership legislation. I am removing this phrase in the introduction, which is redundant since the phrase following it, "advocate for an individual's right to carry a concealed weapon," is more accurate and informative. Zaslav (talk) 03:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to point out, that the Second Amendment is not a US law or privilege, nor is it a right granted by any document. It is to be recognized as a natural right to arm yourself against those who seek to harm you or others. Just because there is more to the world than the US, does not mean that people worldwide do not believe in the values detailed by the Second Amendment or any other "rights" valued by the US.74.7.239.26 (talk) 08:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advocating "concealed" versus "open" carry is a different issue than "Second Amendment" rights There's no redundancy in advocating subsets of categories. One can advocate open, concealed AND Second Amendment rights or any combination thereof. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.225.52 (talk) 14:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ad in an encyclopedia

Now available for $22.95 from Privateer Publications, San Antonio, Texas[3], SuzannaHupp.com[4] or free with paid membership from CHL Protection Plan, Dallas, Texas[5] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.251.226.41 (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks for pointing it out. Kind regards, Spitfire^Tally-ho! 05:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category removed by bot

A Discussion board had just determined that all prominent Chiropractors were to be moved to this category, and this bot simply removed them without comment. Accordingly I am reverting that. ^Д-р_{СДжП,ДС} 15:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]