Talk:Syntactic foam

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemical and Bio Engineering (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Materials Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

I have uploaded a picture of syntactic foams with the file name syntacticfoam.jpg. Can someone link that picture to this article?

Scholarly article

I stumbled on an early paper in the field, thought someone might want to read it. [1]--Joel 20:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

Why is it called "syntactic"? —Ben FrantzDale 20:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check out http://www.cmtmaterials.com/syntactic.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.1.234 (talk) 07:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US export laws

Can a source for this claim be provided? It seems unlikely that anything could not be exported for ANY reason. 86.21.227.237 (talk) 17:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Syntactic foams article

Apparently, an article entitled syntactic foams was created shortly after this one was initiated. They both cover the same material, so a merger of articles is needed. Because syntactic foams is completely unreferenced, not much from it can be used in this article.--TDogg310 (talk) 20:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Every point in that article is already contained in this one, so I went ahead and redirected it. Urocyon (talk) 11:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Syntactic foam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]